LABELS CAN BE TOUGH TO SOAK OFF

#labels #PoliticalCandidates #voting #ProductLabels #PoliticalLabels
When someone labels you, it can be tough to soak off.
But, as observers, we should all learn not to judge people by what someone else labels them.
Conservatives like to call their fellow conservative opponents “liberals.” They are now fixated on calling their actual liberal opponents “communist.”
When one goes to vote, is that person influenced by someone else’s label for a candidate?
He or she should not be.
Labels on food are designed to be factual. They let potential buyers know what is in the package they are picking up.
Often, they let one know how many calories one would consume by eating or drinking the product.
Hopefully, the product’s maker is not misleading consumers by lying on the label.
But, when people are labeled, the intention is not to inform. The intention is to scare or mislead.
It’s one thing for a person to call himself or herself something. That’s telling all who will listen who they are, and how they might react to certain situations.
When others label a person, one should take it with a grain of salt.
As voters, we should rely entirely on what a person has done, or has said. We should not rely on what others say about them.
The exception here is when a person is accused by another of wrongdoing. The accused is very unlikely to admit guilt, at least right away. But, if the accusations are true, or the accusers show credible evidence to back up their allegations, one should take them seriously.
Of course, people can redeem themselves and warrant forgiveness. But, observers should be wary of any redemption efforts. They could be a charade.
When others label a person, it’s often to tell others what such person MIGHT do when he or she is in office.
They are designed to let fearful imaginations run wild at the prospect of this person having power or authority.
Make no mistake. Some politicians or candidates deserve what they are labeled. But, to deserve a label, there must be evidence to back it up.
People often get labeled because what they are proposing, or offering, is good for the public. Good ideas can lead to bad labels.
So, don’t judge a person by what others label him or her. Let them speak, or act, for themselves to tell you who they are.
The act of fighting off a label can be a noble trait. The act of fighting for others who need help is honorable.
So, in this election season, vote. Vote for good people who will work for you. Vote for people who will do their best to keep their promises.
Not voting will get you nothing more than an imaginary label.
Peter

HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE THE CURRENT ‘DAYS’?

#days #eras #labels #innovation #inventions #AI #technology
The 1950s and early 1960s were considered “Happy Days,” as the 1970s TV show called them.
The late 1960s and early 1970s might have been considered “Hippie Days.”
The late 1970s and early 1980s might be called the “Early Tech Days.”
One could describe later periods in various advanced degrees of “Tech,” as the technology revolution proceeded.
But, how would you describe our “Days” today?
Technology continues to advance. AI is coming, if not already here. Many of today’s jobs will either not exist, or be completely revised, in coming years.
The way we interact with institutions and other people changes by the minute.
Decorum, in many instances, has been upended. Individual security – physical and economic – seems to be deteriorating.
So, what will we call this era?
Even more pressing: how will we live through it?
Age will become an important factor. The younger a person is, the more thought must be given to life decisions.
The younger the person, the fewer the expectations there will be for life to be predictable.
The way to survive currently and in the future will be unlike those of the younger generation’s parents or grandparents.
Some principles should remain intact: spend less, save more, be kind to one another etc.
But, even following those principles, what practical outcome will a young life have over the next decades?
We may live longer. We may have fewer children. Old institutions of household, employment and lifestyle may disappear.
How much education we may need will also vary. Expensive education will be, well, optional, particularly if the payoff isn’t worth the cost.
Still, in such a time of upheaval, innovators will emerge.
These innovators will have to reinvent not the wheel, but the circle of life.
Will these inventions pay off for everyone? Will everyone be able to assimilate into this new life?
Perhaps not. But, determination, introspection and pure grit will help people not only survive but also thrive in this new environment.
Not only will people have to choose their paths more carefully, but they may also have to change direction quickly, and numerous times, throughout their lives.
The old song says, “Happy Days Are Here Again.” But the “Happy Days” of decades past will not return, no matter how much we may want them to.
How we label these times may be irrelevant, though it may be a fun academic exercise.
How one finds his or her place in these times will be far more important.
Peter