Tag Archives: do

SHOOTING FROM THE HIP CAN LEAD TO MISSES

Posted on by
Reply
#think #do #FeelGood #RunGovernmentLikeABusiness
Don’t overthink it.
Think before you act.
Measure twice, cut once.
If it feels good, do it.
These adages produce contradictions. As one goes through life, one has to make decisions.
If one has a job, one has to make decisions on the job.
But, how do YOU make decisions? Are you more spontaneous? Or, do you think, and think again, before you act?
If you work in government, how you get to a result is as important, sometimes more so, than the result itself.
Those who “want to run government like a business” are misguided.
Certainly, rules can be a burden. But most of them are there to ensure fairness to all in the process, and to be sure those acting are doing so legally, ethically and in compliance with regulations.
It’s easy to sit back and say we don’t need all those rules and laws. Those who feel that way may be reveling in how the federal government is currently operating.
But, acting quickly and decisively can actually hurt people who don’t deserve to be hurt.
When procedure is important, as it is in most work situations, it’s always better to think before you act.
In social situations, impulsiveness sometimes can be fun.
Today, however, mistakes are happening all around us. Cruelty seems to be desirable. It may seem fun to watch, but those watching with glee could be hurt by much of this.
We may not know how badly it will hurt the unsuspecting until the damage is already done.
Certainly, it’s easier to wield a hatchet than use a scalpel.
But, hatchets are imprecise. Mistakes will occur.
When so many people could be affected, more thought is necessary before acting.
Analysis paralysis can exist in some situations. But, the actor needs to know how his actions will help or hurt, and whom his actions will help or hurt.
So, if you think before you act, generally you are better for it.
Remember to call before you dig. Measure twice, cut once. Give more than a passing thought to important decisions.
You need to know what, or who, will be hurt by your actions. If you don’t care what, or who, gets hurt, shame on you.
Remember, someone watches every action. Sometimes, you may not know who is watching. But, everyone should strive to do the right thing, no matter who is watching.
Peter


DO OR PERFORM?

Posted on by

#do #perform #recognition #jobs

Are you a doer, or a performer?

A doer takes action because he or she wants to get something done, wants to do it well and doesn’t care who, if anyone, is watching.

A performer does something because he or she wants the recognition, or is required to take certain action by whoever is overseeing him or her.

Obviously, those in entertainment are performers, but successful entertainers are also doers, because, mostly in private, they practice to hone their craft.

Workers often find themselves in jobs in which they can perform. They do what is required, but don’t necessarily have a vested interest in the results. They simply do what makes the boss happy.

Other employees deliberately invest themselves in their jobs. Doing great work becomes a matter of pride. They go the extra mile regardless of whether they get credit, or paid extra, for it.

It’s not that doers are necessarily better people than performers. As with entertainers, performance can be necessary. But in ordinary work situations, performance can be a facade.

In other words, what “looks” good may not necessarily “be” good. If something “is” good, the person who did it knows it. And, to that person, it’s all that matters. If some credit comes with it, so be it. If some blame comes with it, so be it.

Whatever job you have, or whatever work you do, try to be personally invested in it. Sometimes, that can be difficult. Sometimes, that can even be impossible. In the latter case, you would be wise to find something else. But, in the former case, you should find something about the job that makes you want to do it, regardless of your orders.

Many employers, though they profess to want doers working for them, are content with performers. They just do what they are told, whether the employees like it or not. If they don’t like it, they know where the door is, and someone else can come in and perform.

These employers usually get what they expect – unhappy workers, high turnover etc.

In decades past, employers valued continuity. They had systems in which longevity and loyalty were rewarded. They hired well and retained well, and didn’t have to retrain frequently.

That mindset disappeared as companies figured that employee longevity was too costly for them. In fact, they came up with theories about how long a person should be employed before the costs of that employee were greater than the employee’s value to the company.

Then, they offered no incentive to stay in one company for a long time. The company saw no future for that employee. That increased “job-hopping,” making it difficult for a worker to plan for his or her future when work was over.

From there came frequent reorganizations and more bad managers. That made even doers – good employees – vulnerable to unforeseen departures.

That converted doers to performers.

The message here is that if you are an employer, and really want doers working for you, do your level best to give them reason to be doers. Better yet, give them reason to be long-term doers.

If you are an employee and a doer, look for a situation that makes it easy for you to be a doer. Yes, you have to have a good amount of self-motivation, but a combination of internal and external motivators is ideal.

So, do your best to be a doer. If you have to perform certain tasks, know the real reason you have to perform them and don’t lose sight of the reason you are a doer.
Peter